Compare · GPUs & AI chips

Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM vs H200 SXM

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #4 VS #8 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026

Side by side

Verdict

Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM ranks #4 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (2.25 PFLOPS); H200 SXM ranks #8 (0.990 PFLOPS).

Rank 04 of 20 · leads

Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

2.25 PFLOPS

MakerNVIDIA

Date2025

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

NVIDIA HGX Platform page, HGX B300 row ("8x NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra SXM", shipping now). FP16/BF16 Tensor Core is the same 36 PFLOPS sparse / 18 PFLOPS dense board total as B200, so 2.25 PFLOPS dense per chip. B300's advertised uplift versus B200 is at FP4 and HBM capacity, not at dense FP16/BF16 — so on this metric B200 and B300 are tied.

Rank 08 of 20

H200 SXM

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

0.990 PFLOPS

MakerNVIDIA

Date2024

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

NVIDIA H200 product page, H200 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 TFLOPS. Footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 141 GB HBM3e. Same Hopper Tensor Core throughput as H100 SXM; H200's difference is memory.

Try another pair

More Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM matchups

Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026

Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip