Compare · Quantum computers
Heron r3 vs Toshiko
RANKED BY PHYSICAL QUBITS ON AN OPERATIONAL SYSTEM
#4 VS #14
CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict
Heron r3 ranks #4 of 16 on Physical qubits on an operational system (156); Toshiko ranks #14 (32).
Rank 04 of 16 · leads
Physical qubits on an operational system
156
MakerIBM
Date2025
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
IBM Quantum hardware page: Heron r2/r3 156 programmable qubits, EPLG 3.7E-3. IBM Newsroom 4 May 2026: median two-qubit error rate 1.17E-3. Condor (1,121 qubits, 2023) is not on the current available-QPU list.Rank 14 of 16
Physical qubits on an operational system
32
MakerOxford Quantum Circuits
Date2023
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
OQC Tech page: "Our 32-qubit Toshiko device is deployed and securely accessible in datacentres in the UK, Japan and soon New York, as well as in a supercomputing centre in Spain." OQC Cloud page: current generation is OQC Toshiko with 32 addressable qubits. No 2Q RB percentage is published on those two pages; CESGA QMIO write-up on oqc.tech gives T1 = 54 μs median / T2e = 66 μs median rather than a 2Q fidelity.Try another pair
Source Vendor product pages and official announcements (Atom Computing AC1000, QuEra Gemini and Aquila, IBM Quantum hardware, Pasqal Orion Gamma…
Last checked 06 Sept 2026