Compare · Reactors & SMRs
Oskarshamn-3 vs Peach Bottom-3
RANKED BY NET ELECTRICAL OUTPUT OF ONE CURRENTLY OPERATIONAL REACTOR UNIT (MWE)
#8 VS #10
CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict
Oskarshamn-3 ranks #8 of 10 on Net electrical output of one currently operational reactor unit (MWe) (1,400 MWe); Peach Bottom-3 ranks #10 (1,331 MWe).
Rank 08 of 10 · leads
Net electrical output of one currently operational reactor unit (MWe)
1,400 MWe
MakerOKG (BWR-3000)
Date1985
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
IAEA PRIS Reactor Details, OSKARSHAMN-3, Operational: Reference Unit Power 1400 MWe, Design Net 1050 (original), Gross 1450, Thermal 3900 MWt. Uprated to 1400 MWe around 2010; 2024 and 2025 operating-history rows still carry 1400 MW. First grid 3 Mar 1985.Rank 10 of 10
Net electrical output of one currently operational reactor unit (MWe)
1,331 MWe
MakerConstellation (BWR-4)
Date1974
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
IAEA PRIS Reactor Details, PEACH BOTTOM-3, Operational: Reference Unit Power 1331 MWe, Design Net 1065, Gross 1412, Thermal 3951 MWt. First grid 1 Sep 1974. Uprated well above original design net; 2019-2025 history rows carry 1331 MW. Peach Bottom-2 on the same site is 1300 MWe net and was not needed once ten rows were filled.Try another pair
Source IAEA PRIS reactor-detail and country pages; EDF Flamanville 3 operator page
Last checked 06 Sept 2026