Compare · Supercomputers
LineShine vs Aurora
RANKED BY RMAX PERFORMANCE (SUSTAINED LINPACK)
#1 VS #4
CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict
LineShine ranks #1 of 5 on Rmax performance (sustained Linpack) (2,198.4 PFlop/s); Aurora ranks #4 (1,012 PFlop/s).
Rank 01 of 5 · leads
Rmax performance (sustained Linpack)
2,198.4 PFlop/s
MakerShenzhen Cloud Computing Center
Date2026
Verified06 Sept 2026
Evidence
HPCwire's own reporting (independent tech press, not a TOP500 data mirror): "LineShine achieved 2.198 Exaflop/s on HPL—about 80 percent of its 2.736 Exaflop/s theoretical peak—making it the first system to exceed two exaflops of sustained double-precision performance using CPUs only." Hosted at the National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen (NSCS). No direct NSCS/operator press release was found in English in this pass; cited to independent journalism rather than a compiled ranking database.Rank 04 of 5
Rmax performance (sustained Linpack)
1,012 PFlop/s
MakerHPE / Intel
Date2024
Verified06 Sept 2026
Evidence
Argonne National Laboratory's own site (the system's operator): Aurora registered 1.012 exaflops using 87% of the system's 10,624 nodes, announced at ISC High Performance 2024. DOE/Argonne system built by Intel and HPE.Try another pair
More LineShine matchups
Source Each system's own operator/lab site (LLNL, ORNL/OLCF, Argonne, RIKEN) plus independent tech-press reporting (HPCwire) for LineShine. Not…
Last checked 06 Sept 2026