Space Computing Energy Tech Transport Science Dev Loyalty ↗ ◐ Dark mode ◎ Enable Alerts
Compare · GPUs & AI chips

H100 SXM vs TPU v5p

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #9 VS #13 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict

H100 SXM ranks #9 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (0.990 PFLOPS); TPU v5p ranks #13 (459 TFLOPS).

Rank 09 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
0.990 PFLOPS
MakerNVIDIA
Date2022
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
NVIDIA H100 product page, H100 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 teraFLOPS. H100 datasheet footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 80 GB HBM3. Tied with H200 SXM on this compute metric.
Rank 13 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
459 TFLOPS
MakerGoogle
Date2023
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
Google Cloud TPU v5p documentation, per-chip specification table: "Peak compute per chip (BF16) (TFLOPs) 459". Same page lists FP8 at 459 TFLOPs. 95 GiB HBM per chip.
Try another pair
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026
Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip