Space Computing Energy Tech Transport Science Dev Loyalty ↗ ◐ Dark mode ◎ Enable Alerts
Compare · GPUs & AI chips

H100 SXM vs Trainium2

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #9 VS #12 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict

H100 SXM ranks #9 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (0.990 PFLOPS); Trainium2 ranks #12 (667 TFLOPS).

Rank 09 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
0.990 PFLOPS
MakerNVIDIA
Date2022
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
NVIDIA H100 product page, H100 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 teraFLOPS. H100 datasheet footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 80 GB HBM3. Tied with H200 SXM on this compute metric.
Rank 12 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
667 TFLOPS
MakerAWS
Date2024
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
AWS Neuron Trainium2 Architecture page, compute table: each Trainium2 chip delivers "667 BF16/FP16/TF32 TFLOPS" dense; sparse counterpart is 2,563 TFLOPS and was not used. 96 GiB device memory. Trn2 instances are generally available (AWS announcement 3 Dec 2024).
Try another pair
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026
Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip