Compare · GPUs & AI chips

Instinct MI355X vs H200 SXM

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #1 VS #8 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026

Side by side

Verdict

Instinct MI355X ranks #1 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (2.5 PFLOPS); H200 SXM ranks #8 (0.990 PFLOPS).

Rank 01 of 20 · leads

Instinct MI355X

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

2.5 PFLOPS

MakerAMD

Date2025

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

AMD Instinct MI355X product page, per-GPU spec: "Peak Half Precision Matrix (FP16) Performance 2.5 PFLOPs" and "Peak bfloat16 (BF16) Matrix Performance 2.5 PFLOPs". Structured-sparsity counterparts on the same page are 5 PFLOPs and were not used. Launch date on the page: 12 June 2025. 288 GB HBM3E.

Rank 08 of 20

H200 SXM

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

0.990 PFLOPS

MakerNVIDIA

Date2024

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

NVIDIA H200 product page, H200 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 TFLOPS. Footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 141 GB HBM3e. Same Hopper Tensor Core throughput as H100 SXM; H200's difference is memory.

Try another pair

More Instinct MI355X matchups

Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026

Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip