Compare · GPUs & AI chips

Instinct MI355X vs TPU v6e (Trillium)

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #1 VS #11 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026

Side by side

Verdict

Instinct MI355X ranks #1 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (2.5 PFLOPS); TPU v6e (Trillium) ranks #11 (918 TFLOPS).

Rank 01 of 20 · leads

Instinct MI355X

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

2.5 PFLOPS

MakerAMD

Date2025

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

AMD Instinct MI355X product page, per-GPU spec: "Peak Half Precision Matrix (FP16) Performance 2.5 PFLOPs" and "Peak bfloat16 (BF16) Matrix Performance 2.5 PFLOPs". Structured-sparsity counterparts on the same page are 5 PFLOPs and were not used. Launch date on the page: 12 June 2025. 288 GB HBM3E.

Rank 11 of 20

TPU v6e (Trillium)

Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip

918 TFLOPS

MakerGoogle

Date2024

Verified04 Sept 2026

Evidence

Google Cloud TPU v6e documentation, per-chip specification table: "Peak compute per chip (bf16) 918 TFLOPs". Google does not publish a separate dense FP16 cell for v6e; this row uses the official per-chip BF16 figure. 32 GB HBM per chip.

Try another pair

More Instinct MI355X matchups

Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026

Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip