Space Computing Energy Tech Transport Science Dev Loyalty ↗ ◐ Dark mode ◎ Enable Alerts
Compare · GPUs & AI chips

TPU v6e (Trillium) vs TPU v5e

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #11 VS #19 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict

TPU v6e (Trillium) ranks #11 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (918 TFLOPS); TPU v5e ranks #19 (197 TFLOPS).

Rank 11 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
918 TFLOPS
MakerGoogle
Date2024
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
Google Cloud TPU v6e documentation, per-chip specification table: "Peak compute per chip (bf16) 918 TFLOPs". Google does not publish a separate dense FP16 cell for v6e; this row uses the official per-chip BF16 figure. 32 GB HBM per chip.
Rank 19 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
197 TFLOPS
MakerGoogle
Date2023
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
Google Cloud TPU v5e documentation, per-chip specification table: "Peak compute per chip (bf16) 197 TFLOPs". 16 GB HBM per chip.
Try another pair
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026
Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip