Space Computing Energy Tech Transport Science Dev Loyalty ↗ ◐ Dark mode ◎ Enable Alerts
Compare · GPUs & AI chips

H100 SXM vs Instinct MI250X

RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP #9 VS #15 CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict

H100 SXM ranks #9 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (0.990 PFLOPS); Instinct MI250X ranks #15 (383 TFLOPS).

Rank 09 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
0.990 PFLOPS
MakerNVIDIA
Date2022
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
NVIDIA H100 product page, H100 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 teraFLOPS. H100 datasheet footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 80 GB HBM3. Tied with H200 SXM on this compute metric.
Rank 15 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
383 TFLOPS
MakerAMD
Date2021
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
AMD Instinct MI250X product page: "Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 383 TFLOPs" and "Peak bfloat16 383 TFLOPs". Launch date on the page: 8 November 2021. 128 GB HBM2e. No structured-sparsity counterpart is published for MI200-series.
Try another pair
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA… Last checked 06 Sept 2026
Full GPUs & AI chips ranking Spot an error? Send a tip