Compare · GPUs & AI chips
H200 SXM vs Gaudi 2
RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP
#8 VS #14
CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict
H200 SXM ranks #8 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (0.990 PFLOPS); Gaudi 2 ranks #14 (432 TFLOPS).
Rank 08 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
0.990 PFLOPS
MakerNVIDIA
Date2024
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
NVIDIA H200 product page, H200 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 TFLOPS. Footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 141 GB HBM3e. Same Hopper Tensor Core throughput as H100 SXM; H200's difference is memory.Rank 14 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
432 TFLOPS
MakerIntel
Date2022
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
Intel Gaudi 3 white paper (document 817486) comparison table lists Gaudi 2 "BF16 MME TFLOPS 432" and "FP8 MME TFLOPS 865". This row uses the BF16 MME cell. 96 GB HBM2e. The same comparison table is the official Intel source already used for the Gaudi 3 row.Try another pair
More H200 SXM matchups
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI355X
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI350X
- H200 SXM vs Blackwell B200 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Gaudi 3
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI325X
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI300X
- H200 SXM vs H100 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI300A
- H200 SXM vs TPU v6e (Trillium)
- H200 SXM vs Trainium2
- H200 SXM vs TPU v5p
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA…
Last checked 06 Sept 2026