Compare · GPUs & AI chips
H200 SXM vs TPU v5p
RANKED BY DENSE FP16/BF16 TENSOR TFLOPS PER CHIP
#8 VS #13
CHECKED 06 SEPT 2026
Side by side
Verdict
H200 SXM ranks #8 of 20 on Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip (0.990 PFLOPS); TPU v5p ranks #13 (459 TFLOPS).
Rank 08 of 20 · leads
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
0.990 PFLOPS
MakerNVIDIA
Date2024
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
NVIDIA H200 product page, H200 SXM column: FP16/BF16 Tensor Core 1,979 TFLOPS. Footnote 2: "With sparsity." Dense is 1,979 / 2 = 989.5 TFLOPS (0.990 PFLOPS). 141 GB HBM3e. Same Hopper Tensor Core throughput as H100 SXM; H200's difference is memory.Rank 13 of 20
Dense FP16/BF16 tensor TFLOPS per chip
459 TFLOPS
MakerGoogle
Date2023
Verified04 Sept 2026
Evidence
Google Cloud TPU v5p documentation, per-chip specification table: "Peak compute per chip (BF16) (TFLOPs) 459". Same page lists FP8 at 459 TFLOPs. 95 GiB HBM per chip.Try another pair
More H200 SXM matchups
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI355X
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI350X
- H200 SXM vs Blackwell B200 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Blackwell Ultra B300 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Gaudi 3
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI325X
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI300X
- H200 SXM vs H100 SXM
- H200 SXM vs Instinct MI300A
- H200 SXM vs TPU v6e (Trillium)
- H200 SXM vs Trainium2
- H200 SXM vs Gaudi 2
Source Vendor product pages and official spec documents (AMD Instinct MI355X / MI350X / MI325X / MI300X / MI300A / MI250X / MI250 / MI210; NVIDIA…
Last checked 06 Sept 2026